Judiciary symbol
The Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday, gave the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), the go-ahead to access and analyse the electronic devices recovered from the residence of former Gov. Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna State.
Justice Joyce Abdulmalik granted the order following an ex-parte motion moved by ICPC’s lawyer, Osuobeni Akponimisingha, to the effect.
Akponimisingha, while moving the motion, had sought an order granting the commission the permission to access and analyse contents of the devices.
He said this was for the purposes of inspection, forensic examination and forensic extraction of data in furtherance of its ongoing investigation of the ex-governor.
There were about 14 sets of electric devices recovered by the commission’s operatives during a search at the Abuja home of the ex-governor.
The devices include a Sony HD-EGS storage device, a ITB transcend storage device, Toshiba storage device, Samsung mobile phone, Nokia mobile phone – N958GB, Blackberry mobile phone device and a Google IDEOS phone.
Others are a Samsung storage device-SPO802N, Remarkable tablet, Apple MacBook Pro – black, Seagate Freeagent desk external drive, ZTE mobile phone, 10 pieces of flash drives and Microcell memory card.
The motion ex-parte is marked : FHC/ABJ/CS/499/2026 between the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai.
NAN reports that El-Rufai is currently before the same court, challenging the search of his house and seeking among others, a N1 billion compensation.
In the fundamental rights enforcement suit, the former governor named ICPC, the Chief Magistrate at the Magistrate’s Court of the FCT, Abuja; the Inspector-General (I-G) of Police and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) as 1st to 4th respondents respectively.
The former governor, in the originating motion on notice marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/345/2026, dated and filed Feb. 20 by Oluwole Iyamu, SAN, sought seven reliefs.
He prayed the court to declare that the invasion and search of his residence at House 12, Mambilla Street, Aso Drive, Abuja, on Feb. 19 at about 2pm by the and ICPC and I-G, amounts to a gross violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights .
He said that it was a violation to dignity of the human person, personal liberty, fair hearing, and privacy under Sections 34, 35, 36, and 37 of the Constitution.”
He urged the court to declare that “any evidence obtained pursuant to the aforesaid invalid warrant and unlawful search is inadmissible in any proceedings against the applicant, as it was procured in breach of constitutional safeguards.”
El-Rufai, therefore, sought an order of injunction restraining the respondents and their agents from further relying on, using, or tendering any evidence or items seized during the unlawful search in any investigation, prosecution, or proceedings involving him.
He sought an order directing the Ist and 3rd respondents (ICPC and I-G) to forthwith retum all items seized from the applicant’s premises during the unlawful search, together with a detailed inventory thereof.
He also sought an order awarding the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira) as general, exemplary, and aggravated damages, among others.
It argued that its operatives acted under a valid search warrant issued on Feb. 18 and executed on Feb. 19 between 1:37pm and 3:56pm at 12 Mambilla Street, Asokoro, Abuja.
The commission said its officials were accompanied by personnel of the Nigeria Police Force, and that the exercise was witnessed by El-Rufai’s wife, Hadiza El-Rufai, and his son, Mohammed El-Rufai.
The ICPC, which urged the court to dismiss the suit, listed the items allegedly recovered from the residence.
The police, also in its counter affidavit deposed to by Insp Ewa Anthony, argued that it had the statutory power to detect, arrest, investigate and prosecute offenders.
It argued that the search carried out at El-Rufai’s residence was executed pursuant to a search warrant issued by a competent court of law.
It disagreed with the ex-governor that that search warrant was invalid, insisting that it was a genuine court order.
It said that its officers who carried out the operation, complied with all applicable legal procedures in the execution of the search warrant.
According to the police, the applicant is trying to use the honourable court to shield him away from the security investigation and prosecution in the court of law.
It, therefore, prayed the court to dismiss the suit in its entirety.(NAN)
